UMB’s performance is measured through nationally recognized benchmarking systems that track research activity, institutional classification, and academic standing. These frameworks provide context for UMB’s position among leading research universities and support long-term strategic planning.

Data Sources

Institutional benchmarking draws from nationally recognized datasets, including:

  • National Science Foundation (NSF) HERD Survey
  • Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)
  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
  • American Council on Education (ACE)
  • Federal higher education data systems (IPEDS, College Scorecard)

Explore Benchmarking and Strategic Data

  • Understand National Research Standing and Performance

    Review rankings and research funding benchmarks, including U.S. News & World Report and federally reported research expenditures.

  • Understand Institutional Classification and Research Activity Level

    Review Carnegie Classifications that group universities by mission, degree offerings, and research intensity.

  • Compare Research and Institutional Outcomes

    Review comparisons with peer universities that share similar research profiles, missions, and institutional characteristics.

How Benchmarking Data Is Used

Benchmarking and classification systems support:

  • Tracking research performance over time
  • Comparing UMB to peer research institutions
  • Informing strategic and academic planning
  • Supporting external reporting and accountability

Together, these frameworks provide a structured view of institutional performance across time and across national peers.